Read e-book online Beyond Hegel and Nietzsche: Philosophy, Culture, and Agency PDF

By Elliot L. Jurist

Are Hegel and Nietzsche philosophical opposites? Can twentieth-century Continental philosophers be classified as both Hegelians or Nietzscheans? during this publication Elliot Jurist areas Hegel and Nietzsche in dialog with one another, reassessing their courting in a fashion that affirms its complexity. Jurist examines Hegel's and Nietzsche's declare that philosophy and tradition are associated and explicates a number of the meanings of "culture" of their work--in specific, the distinction either thinkers draw among historical and glossy tradition. He evaluates their positions at the failure of contemporary tradition and at the have to strengthen conceptions of happy company. it's Jurist's unique contribution to target the mental sensibility that informs the undertaking of either philosophers. Writing in an admirably transparent variety, he strains the continuing legacy of Hegel's and Nietzsche's suggestion in Adorno, Habermas, Honneth, Jessica Benjamin, Heidegger, Derrida, Lacan, and Butler.

Show description

Read or Download Beyond Hegel and Nietzsche: Philosophy, Culture, and Agency (Studies in Contemporary German Social Thought) PDF

Similar philosophy books

The Cambridge Companion to Dewey (Cambridge Companions to - download pdf or read online

Reviewed by way of Matthew Pamental, Northern Illinois University

John Dewey (1859-1952) was once America's top public thinker for good over part a century. His gathered writings soak up thirty seven volumes, with numerous extra volumes dedicated to lecture notes supplied through his scholars, and 3 volumes of correspondence, all released by means of Southern Illinois college Press. therefore it truly is inevitable that any choice of writings approximately Dewey and his proposal may be incomplete. particularly, whereas Dewey's engagement as a public thinker is pointed out either in Robert Westbrook's highbrow biography and Richard Bernstein's and Molly Cochran's discussions of Dewey's imaginative and prescient of democracy, his public philosophy gets no sustained consciousness such as his epistemology and good judgment, for instance. Given Dewey's dedication to definitely the right of philosophy as a device for resolving the "problems of men," it is a major lacuna. That stated, despite the fact that, the gathering of essays in Cochran's The Cambridge spouse to Dewey levels impressively -- either greatly and deeply -- over Dewey's corpus, together with all of Dewey's significant works, his highbrow improvement, and his value as a thinker of democracy. In what follows, i'll lay out the subjects mentioned in each one part and make a couple of severe feedback alongside the way.

Included within the current quantity are an advent through the editor and Westbrook's highbrow biography, via 13 chapters. Cochran helpfully divides those chapters into 5 sections. the 1st part involves chapters by way of Ruth Anna Putnam, Richard M. Gale, Isaac Levi, and J. E. Tiles, and investigates Dewey's naturalism and common sense of inquiry. the second one part comprises essays, by means of Mark Johnson and Matthias Jung, on Dewey's philosophy of brain and motion. within the 3rd part, Jennifer Welchman and James Bohman deal with Dewey's ethics, ethical and social philosophy. The fourth part is a little a catch-all, together with essays by way of Sami Pihlström on Dewey's naturalistic philosophy of faith, Richard Eldridge on Dewey's aesthetics, and Nel Noddings on Dewey's philosophy of schooling. the ultimate part contains essays by way of Bernstein and Cochran on Dewey's belief of democracy and its software to foreign affairs.

The first chapters of the amount mix to set the context for the essays that persist with. After introducing Dewey when it comes to a quick comparability among Dewey's religion within the skill of intelligence to solve social difficulties and President Obama's trust that America's achievements are the results of individuals' acceptance in their shared pursuits, Cochran describes the Darwinian context that observed the delivery of yank Pragmatism and its effect on Dewey. She identifies the speculation of inquiry as an important point in Dewey's reconstruction of philosophy, linking it with Dewey's notions of expertise, intelligence, and occasions prior to giving the description of the rest of the booklet. Westbrook argues that it's Dewey's religion in democracy that varieties the middle of his philosophy. He outlines 3 key issues in Dewey's improvement that cemented democracy because the cornerstone of his philosophy. First, Dewey's first spouse, Alice Chipman, encouraged Dewey to secularize his democratic religion, relocating it clear of its neo-Hegelian, social-Christian roots. moment, the "radical populist" political surroundings of Chicago within the Eighteen Nineties, and Dewey's dating with the activist Franklin Ford, led Dewey to the concept that democracy can in simple terms be fulfilled whilst unfastened inquiry is attached with loose and whole verbal exchange. 3rd, Dewey's reference to Jane Addams and the Hull residence, in addition to his involvement within the Chicago Laboratory institution, allowed him to attach Addams' skill to do solid for the needy to his rising principles approximately democratic schooling. among Cochran's creation and Westbrook's highbrow biography, the reader is supplied with abundant history info from which to start constructing an knowing of Dewey's concept and its position in history.

The part on Dewey's naturalism -- his common sense, metaphysics, and epistemology -- constitutes the most important block of textual content contemplating any of Dewey's perspectives. to make sure, these 3 issues are of substantial curiosity for philosophers -- scholars and execs alike. despite the fact that, there's a major measure of overlap one of the 4 essays, and so one wonders on the inclusion of such a lot of. nevertheless, taken jointly those essays supply hyperlinks to modern discussions of information, fact, adventure, the fact/value hole, the cognitivism/noncognitivism debate, and the realist/antirealist debate, to call yet a few.

Putnam spells out Dewey's epistemology. She will pay specific recognition to Dewey's account of belief, the way it restores a dialogue of features to the post-Galilean belief of technological know-how, and the way that, in flip, permits Dewey to beat the fact/value dichotomy and preserve a constant naturalism approximately either. Gale presents maybe the main idiosyncratic interpretation of Dewey's perspectives, not only since it is going opposed to the grain of such a lot interpretations, but additionally since it posits an "unannounced" metaphysics underlying what Dewey really says. Gale locations Dewey's metaphysics within the culture of all nice metaphysics, from Aristotle to Kant, simply because Dewey's simple metaphysical postulates are unverifiable (75), while Dewey -- as Gale himself issues out -- observed himself as breaking from that tradition.

Levi additionally deviates a bit from the trend of the essays. instead of explicating Dewey's good judgment, Levi issues out the place his personal perspectives on common sense were prompted via the paintings of Peirce and Dewey and argues for a "corrective" view of either. particularly, Levi prefers Peirce's 'removal of doubt' to Dewey's 'resolution to a complex situation' because the objective of logical inquiry, and he attracts out the results of taking that stance instead of Dewey's. regardless of their divergence from the trend of the essays, even if, either Gale and Levi offer enough textual fabric from Dewey to aid their perspectives and supply adequate argument for his or her perspectives for a person to pursue the problem extra. This reviewer, a minimum of, would want for a little bit extra from Levi's article in terms of connecting his method of realizing the common sense of inquiry to the modern literature.

Tiles rounds out the part with a dialogue of the primacy of perform in Dewey's empiricism. Tiles starts with Dewey's concept of expertise, displaying how he broke from the phenomenalism of his empiricist predecessors, but additionally how his empiricism diverges from Quine's. He attracts out the results of Dewey's 'practical beginning point' for his perspectives on sensible judgments and data ahead of carrying out a critique of Dewey on realism and the inspiration of necessity, concluding that Dewey may have accredited a practical account of necessity instead of leaving behind it altogether.

The part on philosophy of brain and motion supplies an intensive account of the affinities among Dewey's useful account of the "body-mind" and modern cognitive neuroscience. Johnson's paintings outlines the fundamentals of Dewey's embodied concept of human cognition. He concludes that pragmatism has a lot to supply present cognitive technology, together with a common philosophical heritage for elaborating an embodied thought of human cognition, a platform for criticizing unsuitable methodological assumptions, and a manner of analyzing the results of cognitive technology which are suitable to our usual lives. Jung's essay starts from an knowing of Dewey's account of the brain mostly in sync with Johnson's, yet applies that realizing to the modern literature in social motion concept. such a lot motion thought, Jung argues, rests on presuppositions which are made difficult by way of Dewey's conception of brain. Dewey's view undermines, particularly, the account of intentionality that undergirds either rational selection concept and normative theories of motion, exchanging their account of rationality with positioned, embodied cognition and forcing a brand new knowing of the teleology of human motion. Jung notes that Dewey reverses the normal individual-social order of supplier, making us social first, contributors later. ultimately, Jung concludes through noting that the best way values include a qualitative point of expertise allows us not to in simple terms commence from a normative standpoint but in addition to exploit the normative features of our event to form our ends, and that this distinguishes Dewey's from utilitarian and normative theories of social motion, in addition to bridging the distance among proof and values.

The 3rd part makes a speciality of Dewey's ethical philosophy. Welchman's essay spells out his uncomplicated perspectives in terms of a sequence of contrasts with modern meta-ethics. First, she issues out that Dewey's perspectives undermine the dichotomy among cognitivism and noncognitivism approximately ethical motivation. moment, she exhibits how his perspectives stand as a rejection of positivism and expressivism approximately values. subsequent, she explicates Dewey's account of the excellence among valuing or prizing and what he termed valuation or comparing. This contrast unearths Dewey's rejection of the means-ends dichotomy: for him, ends and capacity are reciprocally making a choice on. From right here, she strikes via a dialogue of Dewey's account of functional reasoning, which itself unearths that he was once a pluralist in regards to the primary resources of worth. Dewey's pluralism, coupled together with his fallibilism and empirical naturalism, led him to be an anti-absolutist approximately ethical rules, which he took to be instruments for the research of difficult occasions, instead of absolute courses to ethical behavior. From all of this, Welchman concludes that Dewey will be regarded as a "pluralistic welfare consequentialist," and she or he concludes by means of elaborating in this view. Bohman makes a speciality of Dewey's social-psychology in an effort to generate a protection of Dewey's proposal of social democracy. specifically, Bohman issues to the context-sensitivity of human ethical judgment because the key to overcoming skepticism similar to Walter Lippmann's concerning the probability of collective decision-making. in line with Bohman, democracy is the appropriate kind of collective governance since it on my own presents the gap for the correct tools of collective deliberation.

As i discussed, the following part is a little bit a catch-all. Pihlström's essay finds the relationship among Dewey's naturalism and his perception of non secular religion. Dewey's naturalism leaves no room for supernatural entities, yet this results in a query: is Dewey's naturalism suitable with a believable account of the non secular features of expertise, or does it decrease such characteristics to anything else? Intriguingly, Pihlström thinks that we will build a believable non secular naturalism via creating a transcendental movement. Eldridge's essay information Dewey's aesthetics, basically because it is defined in paintings as event. [1] Eldridge identifies issues in Dewey's aesthetic: that the creative act is played for the sake of aesthetic event, and that aesthetic adventure is the consummation of human task, whose value is a functionality of the nature of the job (245). Dewey's hindrance was once that glossy commercial existence bifurcates paintings and that means, the place paintings is basically instrumental to cash or strength, and happiness is just excitement. to the contrary, Dewey argued, artwork issues any job that manipulates issues open air the physique such that the rearrangement produces an adventure impossible with issues of their unadulterated country. Such an event -- no matter if within the artist or in an viewers -- is aesthetic whilst the thing created brings an greater appreciation of its traits. If we comprehend aesthetic event as associated with artworks that undertaking features present in traditional adventure as beliefs, then artwork and aesthetic event can spur us to enhance our practices in gentle of these beliefs (258).

In the ultimate essay during this part, Noddings examines Dewey's perspectives of the kid, the curriculum, studying and inquiry, democracy, and ethical schooling. Her 3 major criticisms of Dewey are undefined) he reduces pondering to the trend of inquiry, ignoring the idea styles of poets, fiction writers, and nature writing; b) he under-emphasizes the relational parts of challenging occasions, leaving out an exam of the people who've the matter; and c) his criterion for comparing methods of social existence -- a very important point in settling on the form of colleges and the curriculum -- is imprecise adequate to be chuffed by means of fascism. Noddings means that the care viewpoint deals an appropriate corrective to Dewey's views.

The ultimate part of the e-book brings us again to Dewey's dedication to democracy. Bernstein reminds us that, for Dewey, democracy is an ethos, or a "mode of linked dwelling. "[2] As such, it truly is a moral excellent greater than easily a collection of political associations. Dewey's democratic religion is the religion that each citizen is in a position to taking accountability for his or her proportion of ruling and that jointly, jointly, we will make higher judgements than we do separately. therefore, Dewey's is an intensive thought of democracy, regarding because it does claims. First, freedom and individuality can merely be attained by means of signifies that are in line with those ends. moment, the top of democracy is radical simply because a) it hasn't ever been tried, not to mention attained, and b) it will require drastic alterations to our present associations. whereas Dewey could be faulted for being obscure or silent at the mechanisms of institutional switch, we have to keep in mind that Dewey used to be a number one reformer of his time, advocating for democratic reforms opposed to the tide of industrialization and globalization.

According to Cochran, Dewey's pondering deals numerous benefits, in that 1) he issues to your next step in ethical schooling, particularly, past loyalty to the countryside, 2) he offers a device for wondering democracy, particularly, the general public, and three) he offers a criterion, particularly progress, for the assessment of transnational procedures. Scholarship of diplomacy should still concentrate on Dewey's rules, she argues, simply because he deals a fashion of considering international publics and a priority for people in foreign decision-making. If we positioned Dewey's notion of democratic publics along with his version of inquiry, we will see that the matter is getting contributors to acknowledge shared, overseas pursuits. whereas tricky, the seeds of such attractiveness could be visible, Cochran argues, in present occasions (327). while a few may well see Dewey's advocacy of democracy at this point as a sort of cultural imperialism, Dewey warned opposed to imperialism and critiqued the United States for its failings during this regard, arguing as an alternative for ethical schooling and development towards democracy.

All informed, the chapters in Cochran's quantity are of continually prime quality, even if the interpretations provided usually are not within the mainstream of Dewey scholarship. furthermore, the bibliography is enough to supply either scholar and non-specialist alike a spot to begin in pursuing concerns extra. As I acknowledged first and foremost, in spite of the fact that, Dewey's public engagement is going mostly unconnected to his extra theoretical paintings. another lacuna within the quantity is the absence of connection with Dewey's fellow pragmatists. back, whereas they do get pointed out, the single sustained comparability comes from Jung's bankruptcy, evaluating Dewey and Peirce at the nature and function of logical inquiry. although, it's a possibility of any quantity that purports to introduce scholars and non-specialists to the paintings of an enormous thinker that it miss points of that individual's paintings, and, to her credits, Cochran has assembled a forged of authors who minimized that hazard. The Cambridge spouse to Dewey will function an exceptional resource for many who are looking to get a wide figuring out of Dewey's perspectives or who easily need a concise explication of lots of the very important parts of his philosophy.

[1] (1934, LW10). Following the quotation strategy within the publication, all references to Dewey's works are to the accrued Works of John Dewey, edited through Jo Ann Boydston (Carbondale: Southern Illinois college Press). The amassed Works are divided into 3 units: The Early Works, 1882-1898 (EW), the center Works, 1899-1924 (MW), and The Later Works, 1925-1953 (LW). References are to yr, quantity, and web page variety of the appropriate set.

[2] (1916, MW9:93)

Copyright © 2004 Notre Dame Philosophical studies

New PDF release: Descartes: A Guide for the Perplexed (Guides for the

  René Descartes is arguably an important seventeenth-century philosopher and the daddy of contemporary philosophy. but his designated approach, and its divergence from the strategy of hisscholastic predecessors and contemporaries, increases complicated and sometimes tough matters. Descartes: A advisor for the puzzled is a transparent and thorough account of descartes' philosophy, his significant works and concepts, offering an incredible advisor to the $64000 and intricate considered this key thinker.

Download PDF by G. E Moore: Some Main Problems of Philosophy

Binding and pages intact. No tears or writing in physique of publication.

Extra resources for Beyond Hegel and Nietzsche: Philosophy, Culture, and Agency (Studies in Contemporary German Social Thought)

Example text

Very few philosophers today, of course, would be inclined to proclaim their allegiance to the Cartesian myth, but this does not mean that we cannot discern the remnants of its influence. In the philosophical culture in which I was raised (that of the late 1970s and the early 1980s), many philosophers regarded the world of culture either as contaminating (and hence to be ignored) or as only a minor component of philosophy (and thus of marginal importance). 4 Analytic Philosophy, of course, has changed over the years.

In emphasizing Kant as the crucial predecessor for both Hegel and Nietzsche, he seems not to give much credence to earlier challenges to Descartes. In Spinoza, for example, we find a protest against the disconnected, disembodied nature of the Cartesian hero. ” It is possible, in fact, to contrast Kant and Hegel to Nietzsche on this point. Still, one can appreciate the frame that Foucault provides without sharing all its premises. Indeed, this study can be understood as an attempt to specify the aspect of phi- 35 The Culture of Philosophy losophy that, according to Foucault, “took on more and more importance” in Hegel and Nietzsche after Kant.

Hegel adopts an expanded sense of rationality that is inclusive of the irrational; thus, his focus is on the intersection of psychology and philosophy. It is fair to say that for Hegel psychology is incorporated into the project of rationality, whereas for Nietzsche psychology supersedes but does not negate the project of rationality. I shall use “psychology of knowledge” to denote a shared sphere in which Hegel and Nietzsche reflect on knowledge and affirm the confluence of knowledge and human flourishing.

Download PDF sample

Beyond Hegel and Nietzsche: Philosophy, Culture, and Agency (Studies in Contemporary German Social Thought) by Elliot L. Jurist


by Michael
4.2

Rated 4.63 of 5 – based on 34 votes